Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of the within-run and between-run precision and accuracy evaluation for the analysis of carnosine (CAR) and anserine (ANS) in plasma using LC-MS/MS

From: Ergogenic effect of pre-exercise chicken broth ingestion on a high-intensity cycling time-trial

Component

Theoretical concentration (nM)

Mean concentration ± SD (nM)

Precision, RSD (%)

Accuracy (%)

CAR

50 a

54.7 ± 2.3

4.2

9.4

50 b

54.4 ± 2.0

3.7

8.7

500 a

487.5 ± 20.0

4.1

−2.5

500 b

491.8 ± 17.1

3.5

−1.6

5000

4328.1 ± 190.7

4.4

− 13.4

5000 b

4419.0 ± 257.1

5.8

−11.6

ANS

50 a

53.8 ± 2.4

4.4

7.6

50 b

53.3 ± 2.4

4.6

6.6

500 a

483.7 ± 21.2

4.4

−3.3

500 b

499.1 ± 25.8

5.2

−0.2

5000

4307.6 ± 116.6

2.7

−13.8

5000 b

4509.2 ± 322.1

7.1

−9.8

  1. Concentrations of 50, 500 and 500 nM correspond with 11.3, 113.1 and 1131.2 ng mL− 1 of CAR and 12.0, 120.1 and 1201.3 ng mL− 1 of ANS, respectively; acceptance criteria: accuracy: ≥ 10 to < 100 ng mL− 1: − 30 to + 10%, ≥ 100 ng mL− 1: − 20 to + 10%, within-run precision (RSDmax): ≥ 10 to < 100 ng mL− 1: 15.0%, ≥ 100 ng mL− 1: 10%; between-run precision: ≥ 10 to < 100 ng mL− 1: 23%, ≥100 ng mL− 1: 16% [19].
  2. Note: a Within-run accuracy and precision (n = 6); b Between-run accuracy and precision (n ≥ 3 per day, at least 3 analysis days); SD Standard deviation, RSD Relative standard deviation