Table 4 Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratio and level of significance for analysis of the association between diagnosis of vitamin D deficiency and diagnosis of depression
From: The relationship between vitamin D status and depression in a tactical athlete population
Parameter | Model 1a | Model 2b | Model 3c | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | p value | CI | OR | p value | CI | OR | p value | CI | |
Vitamin D Status | |||||||||
No Deficient Diagnosis | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
Deficient Diagnosis | 5.84 | < 0.001 | 5.41–6.33 | 5.38 | < 0.001 | 4.95–5.88 | 1.22 | < 0.001 | 1.11–1.33 |
Gender | |||||||||
Male | 1 | 1 | |||||||
Female | 2.34 | < 0.001 | 2.25–2.42 | 1.35 | < 0.001 | 1.29–1.40 | |||
Age Group, Years | |||||||||
18–24 | 2.22 | < 0.001 | 2.05–2.40 | 1.13 | 0.006 | 1.04–1.24 | |||
25–34 | 1.55 | < 0.001 | 1.45–1.67 | 1.15 | < 0.001 | 1.07–1.25 | |||
35–44 | 1.17 | < 0.001 | 1.09–1.23 | 1.14 | 0.001 | 1.05–1.23 | |||
45–64 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
Service Type | |||||||||
Active Guard | 1 | 1 | |||||||
Active Duty | 3.29 | < 0.001 | 3.11–3.48 | 1.24 | < 0.001 | 1.16–1.32 | |||
Career Type | |||||||||
Officer | 1 | 1 | |||||||
Enlisted | 2.62 | < 0.001 | 2.46–2.79 | 1.66 | < 0.001 | 1.56–1.78 | |||
Career Progression | |||||||||
Senior Rank | 1 | 1 | |||||||
Junior Rank | 1.05 | 0.019 | 1.01–1.10 | 1.02 | 0.443 | 0.97–1.06 | |||
MTF Location | |||||||||
Watertown, NY | 1 | < 0.001 | 1 | < 0.001 | |||||
Fairbanks, AK | 1.34 | < 0.001 | 1.19–1.49 | 1.92 | < 0.001 | 1.71–2.17 | |||
Killeen, TX | 2.41 | < 0.001 | 2.25–2.58 | 2.94 | < 0.001 | 2.73–3.16 | |||
Tacoma, WA | 1.19 | < 0.001 | 1.10–1.28 | 1.53 | < 0.001 | 1.41–1.66 | |||
El Paso, TX | 1.35 | < 0.001 | 1.25–1.45 | 1.99 | < 0.001 | 1.85–2.16 | |||
Fayetteville, NC | 1.15 | < 0.001 | 1.07–1.24 | 1.54 | < 0.001 | 1.43–1.67 | |||